When Daughter Number Three-Point-One was in her early elementary school years -- 2000 and 2004 -- we noticed a pattern while walking around during election time.
As you may expect, there are not many Republicans living in Saint Paul and Minneapolis, and so not a lot of yards have Republican lawn signs. But when there are such signs, they almost always seemed to be in yards like these:
Signs for Democrats, on the other hand, were in yards like this:
Yes, that's a rain garden on the right. Or even yards like this:
With no lawn at all.
It's not that signs for Democrats didn't ever appear with a grass lawn. But when they did, the lawn looked more like this:
Which is clearly not fertilized or doused with weed killer, and which looks a little dry because it lacks the consistent watering you get from installing a sprinkler system.
I don't know if this is a case of confirmation bias on my part, or if it's a true pattern. It's particularly tempting to make an analogy about love of monoculture, but I will hold back. It may just be Saint Paul, after all. I can imagine things being different in the suburbs, where a house with signs for Democrats might have a Chem Green lawn just like any other.
But in my city, I'll be watching these particular lawns in 2016 to see what kind of signs (if any) they put up.
Saturday, May 16, 2015
Politics by the Yard
Posted at 9:34 PM
Categories: Elections, Out and About
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Some suburbs: I've noticed the same pattern in GV and SLP, FWIW. Not sure about the outer burbs.
Post a Comment