I've said before: white people know nothing about black people and their history in this country, and here's another example.
But here's an aspect of the case I've never heard before, which was written up in Curt Brown's Star Tribune history column on Sunday: It wasn't just Dred Scott who sued for his freedom, it was also his wife Harriet. And that she may have been more insistent on the legal case than even he was because their children were reaching an age when their enslavers were more likely to sell them.
There isn't a lot of information about Harriet online. I hope I remember to look for more about her instead of forgetting again.
No comments:
Post a Comment